CSM5 - Getting the ball rolling
#1
Posted 23 March 2010 - 06:22 PM
*Clicky* for details.
#2
Posted 23 March 2010 - 08:49 PM
Please excuse me if this is the wrong forum for this kind of questions. If you point me in another direction I'm happy to repost somewhere else. Also I don't expect more than two or three sentences actually.
#3
Posted 24 March 2010 - 11:22 AM
I too read Miyamoto's letter. I'd say that CCP read that letter before Miya even wrote it, as there does seem to be a dedicated effort (especially for Tyrannis) to address Dominion lag (it is even mentioned in Torfi's first dev-blog announcing Tyrannis not to mention all the scheduled testing events on Sisi to correct the lag issues of Dominion).Since the election seasons seems to have officially started let me throw a question in for you: Miyamoto Isoruku just recently wrote an an Open Letter to CCP Regarding Tyrannis which I pretty much completely agree with. What's your position regarding the issues he addressed in the letter?
Please excuse me if this is the wrong forum for this kind of questions. If you point me in another direction I'm happy to repost somewhere else. Also I don't expect more than two or three sentences actually.
Regarding the other two part of Miya's letter: With the UI we have seen a greater focus on that one already (thankx to Dominion) and I do see the EVE Gate part to be quite some help in that same direction (that is simpilying player interaction via mail, as well as looking into the contact/standing system).
I for one would not vote (like Miya seems to do) to get all the CCP devs to work on bug/UI issues as I am not unhappy that other devs (especially artists and web developers) get to do something nice for us as well (PI graphics, new ship graphics, that web page and so on).
Btw plz also do take a look at Kirith's blog post about planetary interaction.
/me is looking forward to see Tyrannis.
[link=http://www.agony-unleashed.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?133286]BASIC - 1107091800[/link], [link=http://www.agony-unleashed.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?172553]WOLFPACKS-20100119[/link]
Participated in [link=http://www.agony-unleashed.com/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?162904]FC BASIC-20091114[/link] - thankx for that one Spin and Tea!
#4
Posted 24 March 2010 - 12:10 PM
If you're not having fun you're doing it wrong.
#5
Posted 24 March 2010 - 12:58 PM
#6
Posted 24 March 2010 - 03:11 PM
#7
Posted 24 March 2010 - 04:20 PM
We are currently doing a priority list which will be presented to CCP next week.I do understand that CCP agreed to make the CSM a stakeholder in the game but that still means you need to prioritize what changes you want to push.
I personally could live without any new content until CCP fixes the existing one. And I am not talking about the lag in fleet fights where they seem to be on the ball, I am talking about tons of content that is plain broken/useless for years now. Some examples (mostly from Miyamoto's letter): Faction Warfare, the overview, certain ships/weapon systems, low sec, bounties, hidden aggro timers, ...
I agree with you on the fixes, but CCP themselves (as I was saying above) are unwilling to do a whole bugfix only expansion again.
As far as FW etc, we argued the those cases for a number of hours. I even attempted to point out that for many people 0.0 is not the Eve endgame and that many people prefer lowsec for various reasons, so buffing that would be good.
#8
Posted 24 March 2010 - 07:36 PM
2) Your participation in Agony related events has dropped off steeply since your election to CSM
Given these two facts, I simply cannot support your bid for re-election.
-Ark
Fake edit - Of course all of the above is complete bullS**T and I will be casting my votes for Teadaze when the time comes
#9
Posted 24 March 2010 - 09:08 PM
I thought that was one of the reasons the corp supported me last time2) Your participation in Agony related events has dropped off steeply since your election to CSM